Timeline for Are questions about parliamentary procedure on-topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2022 at 5:35 | history | edited | Someone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 148 characters in body
|
| Oct 5, 2022 at 20:23 | history | became hot meta post | |||
| Oct 4, 2022 at 9:28 | comment | added | Steve Melnikoff | Whatever the answer for Law.SE, note that there are many questions on this subject over on Politics.SE, where it is definitely on-topic. See, for example, the tags legislative-process and procedure. | |
| Sep 30, 2022 at 17:32 | answer | added | David Siegel | timeline score: 7 | |
| Sep 30, 2022 at 4:46 | comment | added | Someone | @bdb484 would you mind posting that as an answer so it can be voted on? | |
| Sep 30, 2022 at 4:18 | answer | added | Dale MMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 29, 2022 at 0:37 | comment | added | bdb484 | Roberts Rules aren't the law, so it seems to me that the answer would generally be that it's off-topic. | |
| Sep 28, 2022 at 22:06 | answer | added | Trish | timeline score: -3 | |
| Sep 28, 2022 at 14:43 | comment | added | Michael Hall | Yes, but asking if they are isn’t. ;) | |
| Sep 28, 2022 at 10:57 | comment | added | Iñaki Viggers | Why would it not be on topic? Maybe we are missing something from your question. | |
| Sep 28, 2022 at 8:51 | answer | added | user35069 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 28, 2022 at 6:16 | history | migrated | from law.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Sep 28, 2022 at 4:27 | history | asked | Someone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |