Are questions about Robert's Rules of Order and similar topics on-topic on Law Stack Exchange?
Example question: When should a point of order be raised for an error by the chair in calling a vote?
Are questions about Robert's Rules of Order and similar topics on-topic on Law Stack Exchange?
Example question: When should a point of order be raised for an error by the chair in calling a vote?
Certainly questions about the rules of procedure used in legislative bodies, such as municipal councils, state or provincial legislatures, or national legislatures (e.g. the US Congress or the UK Parliament) should be on-topic. At the municipal level, a published set of rules such as Robert's Rules of Order is often used. At the national level, each body tends to have its own unique rules.
It will depend what the question asks. If it relates to, for example, these from our Help Centre:
Legal terms and language, doctrines and theory
Legal process and procedure
Historical legal applications
Then, probably, yes: it will be on-topic. But without knowing the question it's not possible to give a definite answer either way.
We do not limit ourselves only to the law as enacted and enforced by governments.
Legal questions about private law such as contracts, rules of sport or games, or rules of meetings are fine.
Parliamentary procedure is only on topic, if it is set up with a law or legal document, which makes that law or document the topic of the question.