I have a question about my Law Stack Exchange post: Does using ads and making the app contain a book of affiliate links make someone an intermediary?
The question referred to above (kept unedited) was closed for clarity while none mentioned any comment to really ask what difficulty they were having for understanding before mentioned question.
There does not seem to be any lack of clarity the question asked clearly that:
"As intermediaries are defined by law as companies which transmit, receive or store data on someone else's behalf do apps which implement ads for profit or affiliate links fall under this as they are logically doing the same big thing?"
Then it was added: "However it is the ad network that transmits the data or the isp in case of affiliate links so are app developes going to.not be intermediaries and they are not even capable of having ip addresses logged as law requires them to do mainly by way."
Where is the problem how does Law SE suggest writing "Are app developers intermediaries?".