I have a question about my Law Stack Exchange post: Even if the 5th party is suing the 4th, wouldn't 4th and 5th parties' arguments that 3rd party broke the chain of causation be identical?
Dale M should NOT have deleted If D1 can't sue D2, then wouldn't D1 and D2 argue identically that D3 broke the chain of causation? Why not? Because Dale M does not appear to have carefully read both questions, which are distinguishable. In the deleted question, the 5th party is barred from suing the 4th because the 4th is bankrupt. Thus the 5th party's Statement of Defence shall necessarily differ for these two separate questions.
Alas, Rick too did not carefully read, and distinguish, both questions.