Security.StackExachange mainly exists to talk about hacking and hacking prevention. As you might expect, questions about what's legal and whether someone should press changes come up quite frequently. Our usual response is to close the question with a comment "You need to hire a laywer dude. We can't help you".
Somebody recently asked in a meta.security.SE question whether our Help Center should include a link to Law.SE. The accepted answer [disclaimer: mine] basically says "I'm pretty sure that Law.SE is not a free laywer service, so they may be ok with general legal thought-experiments, but let's not send them specific people's specific problems".
Questions:
Do you guys agree with what was said in the meta.security.SE post?
Where do you draw the line between "interesting thought-experiment" and "your specific problem"?
Answers to those would help us make rules for which questions we close, and which we migrate to you.