Consider this very reasonable question "Defamation due to breach of confidentiality" which has attracted three answers from high-rep users and those answers very plainly contradict each other: Yes, Possibly, and No.
Also each answer comes with a justification that, to my mind, I having never gone to law school, and considering each answer independently, seems reasonable.
So as it stands, the OP - not to mention all readers - are left even more in the dark than if the question had never been asked.
What's generally done with this sort of Q&A?
(I suppose one possible answer is: Just suck it up, grasshopper. But is there a better/different/locally preferred action?)