All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0 votes
1 answer
63 views

Is it off-topic to ask whether the legal community considers law a form of technology?

In Slate's Slow Burn podcast, Linda Hirshman says: A big achievement for feminism was to bring the social technology of law into the single-family dwelling. Elsewhere, I have adopted this ...
Tom's user avatar
  • 954
2 votes
1 answer
40 views

Could we change which question is linked to this duplicate question?

I asked this question, and it was proposed that it be closed as a duplicate of this question. I accepted the proposal because the answer to that question indicated the specific statute related to ...
T Hummus's user avatar
  • 636
-5 votes
1 answer
116 views

I'm tired of the answers in comments and down votes, so the community will now be deprived of the answer post because I'm deleting the question

I'd asked What is a special verdict form, and what is the basis in law for this jury to be able to develop their own theory and not have to disclose it? There are several helpful and thoughtful ...
uhoh's user avatar
  • 816
3 votes
0 answers
78 views

Retag single-tagged [any-jurisdiction] and [multiple-jurisdiction] Questions

This community has reached a consensus to remove the [any-jurisdiction] tag and the [multiple-jurisdiction] tag from Law SE. Because there are over 250 questions with those tags (combined) we are NOT ...
Sasha's user avatar
  • 101
5 votes
0 answers
162 views

When an existing question raises for you an additional question about the law, please ask that as a new Q&A

Sometimes when reading a question, you will realize there is a gap in your own legal knowledge. Instead of using a comment to ask that the question author explain the law to you, you should ask your ...
Jen's user avatar
  • 59.2k
6 votes
0 answers
82 views

Merge [tag:vaccine] and [tag:vaccination]

The tags vaccine and vaccination seem synonymous. Let's merge them?
Franck Dernoncourt's user avatar
-2 votes
1 answer
80 views

In the future can the people behind the law branch of Stack Exchange support HTML tags `<u>...</u>` for underlining?

In the future (e.g. next year) would the people behind the law branch of Stack Exchange be willing to support HTML tags <u>...</u> for underlining? An example is shown below: <u>...
Samuel Muldoon's user avatar
10 votes
3 answers
341 views

Are we perhaps going overboard with the "request for legal advice" closures?

It seems that editors and moderators have grown increasingly aggressive in the last year or two with the votes to close questions because they "clearly ask for specific legal advice." I have ...
bdb484's user avatar
  • 60.6k
0 votes
2 answers
63 views

Is [us-constitution] a useful tag?

Is there any purpose for the us-constitution tag, considering that US-specific questions should also be tagged with united-states, and us-constitution does not provide any information not given by the ...
Someone's user avatar
  • 17k
1 vote
1 answer
111 views

Who can edit questions?

Some dude with less than 5k reputation edited this question of mine: Is there a definition/test for "lack of merit" (legal arguments)? I don't want that modification. Of course I can edit it ...
Greendrake's user avatar
  • 27.6k
4 votes
3 answers
150 views

Should multiple answers by one user for different jurisdictions be combined?

If I am answering one question for multiple jurisdictions (for example, I am answering both for the United States and Canada), should I post one long answer or multiple shorter ones?
Someone's user avatar
  • 17k
1 vote
1 answer
46 views

Why do `.jpg` embedded from the Wikimedia commons not display properly?

Almost all images embedded on stack exchange (SE) are hosted at i.sstatic.net. However, there are a lot of pictures on Wikipedia for which the copyright is conducive to sharing images with others. It ...
Samuel Muldoon's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
40 views

Would [affirmative-action] be a useful tag?

Would it be useful to have an affirmative-action tag for discrimination questions that are specifically about actions intended to benefit underrepresented groups? This could be a useful ...
Someone's user avatar
  • 17k
8 votes
2 answers
136 views

Should we remove [multiple-jurisdiction] along with [any-jurisdiction]?

Considering the consensus to remove any-jurisdiction, should we also remove multiple-jurisdiction, currently used on 47 questions?
Someone's user avatar
  • 17k
1 vote
2 answers
140 views

Is it encouraged to delete one’s question-comments as soon as the contained questions are answered so that the remaining coments no longer make sense?

There’s a word for deleting only one’s own half of a conversation on an online discussion platform so that it just seems as though the other party is talking to themselves. If anyone knows what it is, ...
TylerDurden's user avatar
-5 votes
1 answer
194 views

What is the purpose of this site if it is not to ask for legal advice?

Law Stack Exchange does not allow questions that ask for, or answers that provide, specific legal advice. What is the purpose of a legal question-and-answer site that does not allow legal advice?
user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
67 views

2023: a year in moderation

It’s that time of the year again! As we wave goodbye to last year and welcome the new one, we have a tradition of sharing moderation stats for the preceding calendar year. As most of you here might be ...
JNat's user avatar
  • 101
7 votes
1 answer
240 views

Proposal for a new ask question modal

It was suggested in a comment by Laurel on Trish's answer to Jen's Meta question on jurisdiction tags to edit the "Ask Question" modal. I agree that that's a good idea, especially ...
Someone's user avatar
  • 17k
0 votes
2 answers
121 views

How can a question like this one possibly be more focused?

What are the most prominent differences among the common law systems of the different states in the U.S.A.? The question above was closed on the grounds that it needs to be more focused? I could ask ...
Michael Hardy's user avatar
5 votes
3 answers
378 views

When is a jurisdiction tag required in a question?

The help page says: If you are looking for the law in a particular area, please tag your question with the appropriate jurisdiction tag (e.g. united-states, texas, new-york-city, england-and-wales). ...
Jen's user avatar
  • 59.2k
3 votes
1 answer
52 views

Merger of [Trees] and [Treelaw]

We have both the tags trees and treelaw. Both are about the same item: trees and their impact on property law. As such, they should be merged. Which one should be retained and synonymized to the other?...
Trish's user avatar
  • 40.4k
-8 votes
1 answer
214 views

Do we have a problem with sexist, and generally overly zealous moderators?

I’m sick of what I have noticed as overly zealous moderation when it comes to opposing, however gently, mildly, and courteously, the remake of apparently female users. The moderators appear especially ...
TylerDurden's user avatar
-2 votes
1 answer
172 views

Does using specific events or phenomena to exemplify (or even define) one’s question actually present any problem?

I’ve seen questions edited or closed in order to generalise them and edit out any reference to the original event that inspired and prompted the question. I suspect that this is because of the ...
TylerDurden's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
109 views

How (and why) could a post be “removed from network questions”?

A recent question’s edition history shows that it was “removed from network posts” by one of the moderators. Why is it possible for doing this, and what are valid reasons for which a moderator might ...
TylerDurden's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
199 views

Are moderator warnings intentionally unspecific?

I recently had a comment exchange with a user that my conversation partner as well as the moderators found violated the code of conduct. The details are irrelevant here. I received a private message ...
Peter - Reinstate Monica's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
99 views

Looking for an old post I’ve seen before

I remember seeing a post before that concerned how to bring a claim in England against an anonymous “placeholder” defendant whose address for service (or other details like complete name) one doesn’t ...
TylerDurden's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
50 views

Should questions at some point be closed as moot or obsolete?

Without any disrespect to Trish who answered this question today, after the fact, based upon what actually happened, at some point, should questions like the following question from 2016: North Korea'...
ohwilleke's user avatar
  • 220k
1 vote
1 answer
78 views

Politically incorrect tag: North-Korea -> DPRK

The country commonly called north-korea is actually the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea". That is too long for a tag, which only allows 35 characters. The proper shorthand would be ...
Trish's user avatar
  • 40.4k
-3 votes
2 answers
139 views

Is there a policy on editing questions to clarify them after answers have already there been posted?

A recent, (IMO) otherwise non-sequitur comment claims that “we don’t allow edits that invalidate answers that have already been posted,” but I’ve never heard of a policy like this. What I have seen ...
TylerDurden's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
193 views

This site's comment scope is more permissive than the network default

Although the help page sets out a fairly narrow scope for comments, law.stackexchange.com practices a more permissive scope for comments than the text sets out. On law.stackexchange.com, if people are ...
Jen's user avatar
  • 59.2k
-4 votes
1 answer
236 views

Is self-deprecating credentialism in line with the spirit of stack exchange?

There is a recurrent meme of legal matters being ostensibly too important to entrust to the advice of “anonymous people on the internet”. Yet many of these people may or may not be elite legal minds ...
TylerDurden's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
102 views

Test for relevance of the "copyright" tag

I noted there has been some opposition to me applying the "copyright" tag to this question. Do we consider it relevant only when it legally applies to the subject? Or do we also consider it ...
Greendrake's user avatar
  • 27.6k
0 votes
1 answer
90 views

What are the benefits of removing comments without replying to them on the basis that they’ve been addressed in an edit?

Certain users are fond of seeing questions on answers and then integrating their answers to the answer to which they were a comment before removing the comment that is apparently considered to be “no ...
TylerDurden's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
261 views

What is the proper place to voice my dissatisfaction with moderator behaviour?

I’m dissatisfied with what I consider to be shocking displays of arrogance by a certain moderator and would like to express my objections. What is the right way and place to do this?
TylerDurden's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
123 views

I would like to edit my answer to replace the example, in order respond to a critique in the comments

I would like to make this edit, but it was rolled back. The original example application of judicial notice that I have included in the answer is attracting comments that critique the judge's math. ...
Jen's user avatar
  • 59.2k
23 votes
1 answer
536 views

So long, and thanks for all the fish

Goodbye, y'all. I've been diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) so I'm off to ammend my will and complete my bucket list before it's too late.
user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
133 views

Where exactly is my lack of focus?

A few hours ago, out of curiosity, I did post the following question On the legality of seizing narco yachts which was closed because it "needs to be more focused". If "board and ...
Rodrigo de Azevedo's user avatar
-6 votes
2 answers
331 views

Was this answer somewhat disingenuous in one or two ways? Or did it genuinely address the question as asked in good faith?

My question Can defendants arraigned in federal court sometimes be "out on bail" secretly with no way for the public to know about or verify the bail? asks if something is possible i.e "...
uhoh's user avatar
  • 816
0 votes
1 answer
107 views

What to do about AI edits that are helpful?

https://law.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/57118 This edit was quite clearly done with ChatGPT (see the last paragraph), but it does improve the post. How should edits like this be handled?
Someone's user avatar
  • 17k
4 votes
4 answers
380 views

How educational is too educational?

After almost six months being live, on 2023‑07‑28 Pat W. deleted my answer (for reference repeated below). It is in style a full legal opinion as to be handed in at the end of a typical 120-minute ...
Kai Burghardt's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
213 views

Is the LawSE response to suspected AI generated posts still in force?

The Temporary policy: ChatGPT is banned states that: Posting GPT answers on Law Stack Exchange is temporarily banned. And the answer from a Moderator when asked How should we handle ChatGPT answers? ...
user avatar
11 votes
3 answers
240 views

Should we have a LawSE definition of "educational purposes only"?

I'm inviting discussion and suggestions on the value of creating an faq post defining "Educational Purposes Only" The home page's Banner has the embedded link educational purposes only that ...
user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
278 views

How To Deal wIth AI Postings At Law.SE

user @SergZ has a modus operandi of making lots of AI posts with minimal editing in other forums and appears to be doing so in this forum, but, of course, it is hard to tell sometimes. I deleted one ...
ohwilleke's user avatar
  • 220k
0 votes
1 answer
135 views

Old post showing on home page as modified more minutes ago (by community bot) but no evidence of modification is apparent

When I look at the old post it doesn’t seem as though any modification has in fact been recently made. What is the explanation for this?
TylerDurden's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
104 views

Where a question merely asks about a word's etymology, should it be asked here or on English.SE?

Some questions ask about the etymology of a word that happens to be used in law, but where there is nothing special about the word's use in law. Is the mere fact that a word is used in law enough to ...
Jen's user avatar
  • 59.2k
0 votes
1 answer
89 views

Why does the snippet in my notifications contain a string that doesn’t appear in the post?

In my notifications it shows the first few words of the subject answer. Here the answer seems to begin with the word “assuming”. Then I open the (never edited) answer, and it doesn’t contain that word ...
TylerDurden's user avatar
-3 votes
1 answer
103 views

Requests for Reopen & Undeletion Votes (volume 07/2023 — today)

Let me analogize this. Does (Ontario's) Consumer Protection Act, 2002 protect Consumers travelling on the Toronto Transit Commission? Why or why not? Did Instagram breach Business Practices and ...
user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
66 views

Does (Law) StackExchange reach out to law schools and professors?

To my pleasant surprise, I just spotted that George Mason University's Antonia Scalia Law School touts us! Law Stack Exchange Question-and-answer forum for legal professionals, students, and others ...
user avatar
-1 votes
3 answers
189 views

Should Tor users be blocked?

I recently tried signing up on law.stackexchange.com through Tor (to ask a question anonymously), and the signup page wouldn't let me, consistently giving the error: Something went wrong. Please ...
hanshenrik's user avatar
  • 1,141
1 vote
0 answers
53 views

Request tag synonym tag:adverse-possesion -> tag:adverse-possession

The tag adverse-possesion is misspelled. I have re-tagged the newest question with a properly spelled adverse-possession. Could someone create a tag synonym to point from adverse-possesion to adverse-...
Jen's user avatar
  • 59.2k

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
13