Not infrequently, a given user will ask a large number of questions that all clearly pertain to a specific legal issue upon which the user would like specific legal advice, issue by issue.
What is the best way to address this practice?
Not infrequently, a given user will ask a large number of questions that all clearly pertain to a specific legal issue upon which the user would like specific legal advice, issue by issue.
What is the best way to address this practice?
What is the best way to address this practice?
Just let contributors answer those posts as they see fit. This approach advances the LawSE's educational purpose that is stated in the upper right portion of every LawSE post. The rest of that disclaimer is devised to prevent OPs from mistakenly implying something about the character of the answers provided.
Developing a rationale about some topic of law has the same educational value regardless of whether or not an OP sounds like asking for legal advice, writes in third person, or includes boilerplate such as "This is a hypothetical scenario".
Unfortunately, very often those questions are downvoted and/or closed under the pretext of being "off topic". Insofar as they obviously entail concepts and/or sources of law, it is odd to label them as "off-topic" merely because of how those questions originated (i.e., someone's personal, specific matter). The very notion of topic refers to subject, theme, or branch of knowledge. An OP's circumstantial motive for posting a question does not change the extent to which his questions are about the law.